Quable review: PIM and DAM for brands, now part of Ibexa
Quable is a SaaS PIM with built-in DAM and a brand portal, aimed at brands in fashion, beauty, food and retail. Quable has been majority owned by Ibexa since December 2024 and is branded Quable by Ibexa. Quable prices by quote across a Standard and an Advanced plan, and cites 3 to 6 months to full operation.
Strong fit when
- French and francophone brands that want PIM, DAM and a brand portal from one vendor
- Marketing-led product teams in fashion, beauty or food that prioritise ease of use
- Brands sharing product sheets and marketing kits with retailers or distributors through a portal
- Buyers already considering Ibexa for digital experience who want one supplier relationship
Weak fit when
- Technical B2B manufacturers that need BMEcat or GDSN output from the PIM
- Organisations that require on-premise or private cloud deployment of the PIM
- Buyers who want the PIM contracted fully separate from any DXP sales conversation
- Catalogues above 50,000 products that need the Standard plan's price point
Ideal customer profile. A mid-sized French or francophone brand in fashion, beauty, food or retail that wants PIM, DAM and a partner portal in one SaaS.
What Quable is built for
Quable is a SaaS PIM with built-in DAM for brands in fashion, beauty, food and retail. This profile is based on public documentation and PIMvendors selection work. Quable is one of the French vendors in the PIM vendor directory.
Ibexa became majority shareholder on 17 December 2024, and the product is now branded Quable by Ibexa. Ibexa is part of QNTM Group. The announcement states that Quable keeps operational independence in defining its PIM.
The platform covers PIM, DAM, a brand portal for partners and catalogue feeds for import and export. Its flexible data model handles products, materials, colours, ingredients, services, recipes and stores. Quable sells two plans: Standard, up to 50,000 products with seat-based users, and Advanced, with unlimited products and seats. Buyers comparing Quable with Plytix or Akeneo should map their attribute model first, since Advanced holds the deeper modelling features.
Where Quable is strong
Quable is strongest for brand teams that want PIM, DAM and partner distribution in one easy SaaS product. Five documented capabilities support that.
- PIM and DAM in one platform. The DAM is built in on both plans, so media and product records share one workspace.
- Brand portal included. Brands share products and marketing kits with retailers and distributors through an online showroom, without exporting spreadsheets.
- Developer access on every plan. Standard includes REST and GraphQL APIs with webhooks, imports and exports, completeness scoring and a PDF builder.
- AI for content and translation. Both plans include AI text generation and translation; Advanced adds bulk generation and translation.
- A stated delivery window. Quable cites an average of 3 to 6 months to full operation after the needs analysis. That gives buyers a benchmark to hold the vendor to.
In PIMvendors selections, marketing users adopt Quable's interface quickly. That observation applies to brand teams with consumer-facing content and moderate attribute counts.
Where Quable is limited
Quable's limits concern ownership direction, technical B2B depth, plan boundaries and deployment choice. Each is specific enough to test.
- Ownership and bundling. Quable's roadmap now sits inside a digital experience group. Expect Ibexa DXP to enter the commercial conversation, and ask how PIM roadmap priorities are set.
- Standards coverage. The platform page names ETIM classification as a use case but does not mention BMEcat, GS1 or GDSN. Technical B2B and food retail buyers must test these outputs.
- Plan boundaries. Advanced data modelling, visual workflows, advanced permissions and task management sit in Advanced only. Governance-heavy teams should price Advanced from the start.
- SaaS only. No on-premise or private cloud option is documented.
- Regional depth. In PIMvendors selections, Quable's implementation partner network is concentrated in France. Dutch, Belgian and German buyers should check partner capacity in their own language.
Ideal customer profile
Quable fits mid-sized brands with consumer-facing content, moderate data complexity and a strong French or francophone base. The table reflects the Fit Finder record and PIMvendors selection work.
| Dimension | Typical Quable fit |
|---|---|
| Company size | Mid-sized, with some smaller and enterprise brands |
| Business model | Brands first; retailers and simple manufacturer catalogues |
| Data complexity | Low to medium: variants, materials, ingredients, media |
| Region | France and francophone markets, then wider Europe |
| Ecosystem | Shopify and commerce platforms via Quable Apps; Ibexa DXP |
Belgian buyers with French and Dutch content are a natural fit, provided partner support in Dutch is confirmed. Retailers that onboard many suppliers should test portal and import validation in detail.
Pricing model
Quable prices by quote, with no public prices recorded. The pricing page describes tailor-made pricing adapted to use and growth objectives. The plans page names the drivers: needs, organisation size and number of users.
Plan choice is the first cost driver. Standard is seat-based and capped at 50,000 products, while Advanced removes both limits and adds governance features. The second driver is user count on Standard. The third is partner implementation effort, which Quable's service and agency partners quote separately.
Ask for a three-year price for both plans at your expected product count and user count. If Ibexa DXP is part of the conversation, ask for the PIM priced on its own as well. The PIM licence negotiation guide covers how to keep bundle discounts from hiding the standalone price.
Implementation reality
Quable projects run through Quable and its service and agency partners, with the Quable Air method as the fast-start option. Quable states an average of 3 to 6 months to full operation once the needs analysis is finalised.
PIMvendors estimate: add 4 to 8 weeks of requirements and data model work before that clock starts. A typical project runs in four steps:
- Design the data model and plan choice.
- Migrate existing product and media data.
- Set up the brand portal and partner access.
- Publish the first commerce channel through Quable Apps or feeds.
Buyers tend to underestimate media migration. Moving thousands of images with correct product links takes more time than moving attributes. They also underestimate ERP integration, since no named ERP connector is documented and the link usually runs through the API. Plan for the integration work explicitly in the partner quote.
Scenarios to run in the demo
Four scenarios from the PIM demo scenario library test Quable's strengths and its gaps on your own data.
| Scenario | What it tests in Quable | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| SC-09 Link assets to products and variants | Built-in DAM and bulk linking rules | Assets uploaded one by one per product |
| SC-08 Translate and localise into four languages | AI translation and localised attributes | Technical values duplicated per language |
| SC-12 Schedule a seasonal launch across channels | Workflows, channel rules and readiness | Scheduling left to the webshop |
| SC-25 Create items from ERP with a clear master split | API-based ERP link and attribute ownership | Syncs that overwrite enriched content |
Run SC-12 on the Standard plan if Standard is the target. Visual workflows sit in Advanced, so the result shows which plan your scenarios need.
Alternatives and comparisons
PIM Selection has no head-to-head comparison that includes Quable yet. The PIM vendor comparisons index will list one when it is published.
Until then, buyers can build their own comparison from the profiles of the brand-oriented SaaS PIMs Quable most often meets, such as Plytix and Akeneo. Use the same four scenarios above on each vendor so the results compare like for like. The brands and retailers shortlist groups Quable with other brand-oriented platforms. The PIM Landscape Map shows where Quable sits by segment and region. The PIM Fit Finder ranks alternatives against your own size, business model and ecosystem.
Quable is easy for brand teams to adopt, and its DAM and portal cover a lot of ground. Since the Ibexa deal, put the PIM roadmap and any DXP bundle terms in writing before you sign.
Want a second pair of eyes on your selection?
PIM Selection is published by PIMvendors.com, which runs scenario-based PIM selections for European manufacturers, distributors and brands. A 30-minute call is enough to see whether that helps.
See PIMvendors selection servicesBook a call with PIMvendors
Frequently asked questions
How much does Quable cost?
Quable publishes no prices. The Quable plans page lists a Standard plan for up to 50,000 products with seat-based users and an Advanced plan with unlimited products and seats, both priced by quote. Quable says pricing depends on needs, organisation size and number of users. Implementation partner fees come on top and should be quoted alongside the licence.
Is Quable SaaS only?
Quable is delivered as a SaaS platform, and no on-premise or private cloud option is documented on its platform page. Quable cites 99.9 percent availability as a vendor figure. Buyers with data residency or hosting requirements should ask Quable to confirm hosting region, sub-processors and exit terms in writing during the RFI.
What kind of companies use Quable?
Quable targets brands in fashion, beauty, food and retail, and cites more than 300 brands as customers. In PIMvendors selections, Quable fits mid-sized French and francophone brands that want PIM, DAM and a brand portal in one product. Technical B2B manufacturers with BMEcat or GDSN requirements usually test Quable against more B2B-oriented platforms.
How long does a Quable implementation take?
Quable states an average of 3 to 6 months to full operation once the needs analysis is finalised. PIMvendors estimate: add 4 to 8 weeks for requirements and data model work before that clock starts. The Quable Air method is positioned as a fast-start approach, but Quable publishes no separate timeline for it.
What are the alternatives to Quable?
PIM Selection has no head-to-head comparison for Quable yet. In PIMvendors selections, Quable is usually weighed against other brand-oriented SaaS PIMs with DAM, such as Plytix and Akeneo. The brands and retailers shortlist and the PIM Fit Finder rank alternatives against your own size, model and ecosystem.
Sources and method
- Quable PIM platform
- Quable plans
- Quable pricing
- Ibexa and Quable alliance (Quable blog, December 2024)
- QNTM Group newsroom: Quable joins Ibexa
- CB Insights: Quable
How this page was made: drafted by the PIM Selection editors from the sources listed, checked against the PIMvendors selection method, and signed off by a named expert. Editorial policy.
Cite this page
PIM Selection (2026). Quable review: PIM and DAM for brands, now part of Ibexa. PIMvendors.com. https://pimselection.com/vendors/quable/ (version 2026-10-14).